From owner-freebsd-security Wed Feb 16 9:26:47 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from builder.freebsd.org (builder.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.24]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5BEC37B54B for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2000 09:26:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228]) by builder.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FB60132DD for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2000 09:26:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA25197; Wed, 16 Feb 2000 09:26:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) To: Warner Losh Cc: Richard Wackerbarth , freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why should I upgrade from 2.2.8 to 3.4 In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 16 Feb 2000 03:33:05 MST." <200002161033.DAA10121@harmony.village.org> Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2000 09:26:33 -0800 Message-ID: <25194.950721993@zippy.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org And I just removed all traces of 2.2.8 from ftp.freebsd.org - that ought to drive the right behavior. :) - Jordan > In message <00021604155000.08535@nomad.dataplex.net> Richard Wackerbarth writ es: > : Perhaps there needs to be a more emphatic public posting to the > : effect that 2.2.x is "moldy" and supported only to the extent that > : the few remaining users of this system contribute patches. Unless > : they have COMPELLING reasons to remain with 2.2.x, all users SHOULD > : UPGRADE to 3.4. > > I've been saying that 2.2.x isn't supported since about the 3.3 > timeframe, which was at least six months ago. > > Warner > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message