From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Sep 18 17:51:57 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mail.viasoft.com.cn (unknown [61.153.1.177]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2E5237B40E; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 17:51:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from davidwnt (davidwnt.viasoft.com.cn [192.168.1.239]) by mail.viasoft.com.cn (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id IAA17478; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 08:55:56 +0800 Message-ID: <002701c140a4$c5735a10$ef01a8c0@davidwnt> From: "David Xu" To: "Daniel O'Connor" , "Alexander Langer" Cc: "Robert Withrow" , "Jordan Hubbard" , , References: Subject: Re: Version of XFree86 in FreeBSD Release 4.4 Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 08:48:14 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I'm confused why Open and NetBSD both have XF4 installed, while we = can't. why! David Xu ----- Original Message -----=20 From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: "Alexander Langer" Cc: "Robert Withrow" ; "Robert Withrow" = ; "Jordan Hubbard" ; = ; Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 8:14 AM Subject: Re: Version of XFree86 in FreeBSD Release 4.4 >=20 > On 18-Sep-2001 Alexander Langer wrote: > > > The previous suggestion (have a generic XFree86 port) is a) hacky, = but b) > > > workable in the current package framework I suspect.. > > =20 > > Yes, would be a nice workaround. > > =20 > > I don't use packages, though :) >=20 > I'm forced not to if I'm using a machine which needs X4.. >=20 > Usually for a fresh install I use packages since it gets a working = machine > quicker :) >=20 > --- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message