Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 14:50:35 -0500 From: parv <parv_fm@emailgroups.net> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: "James E. Flemer" <jflemer@acm.jhu.edu>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: make index cruft (work/.comment_foo) Message-ID: <20030312195035.GB4065@moo.holy.cow> In-Reply-To: <20030312182601.GC86403@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <Pine.LNX.4.33L2.0303120103100.30559-100000@centaur.acm.jhu.edu> <20030312072029.GA84349@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030312092449.GA2211@moo.holy.cow> <20030312182601.GC86403@rot13.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
in message <20030312182601.GC86403@rot13.obsecurity.org>, wrote Kris Kennaway thusly... > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 04:24:49AM -0500, parv wrote: > > ... > > In the meantime though, there is not only no saving of inodes, > > but also a bit larger Makefiles due to duplicity ... not that > > i am complaining (much). > > What duplicity are you referring to? Duplicity of comment being in the Makefile and in work/.comment.*. As i said, i am not complaining. If it would take some temporary files, for reasonable amount of time, to fully convert pkg-comment to a Makefile variable, i am all for it. - parv -- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030312195035.GB4065>