Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 00:34:43 -0800 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Daniil Cherednik <dcherednik@masterhost.ru> Cc: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, freebsd-apache@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8.2 + apache == a LOT of sigprocmask Message-ID: <4EC4C723.9090606@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4EC4C623.4090207@masterhost.ru> References: <4EC17AAF.9050807@FreeBSD.org> <4EC17F57.5030008@FreeBSD.org> <20111115090745.GO50300@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20111115100904.GA92795@icarus.home.lan> <4EC4ADC3.2060604@FreeBSD.org> <20111117074909.GL50300@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <4EC4C623.4090207@masterhost.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/17/2011 00:30, Daniil Cherednik wrote: > I am sorry for repeat (I wrote about it), but what do you think about > this hack: Danill, thanks, and sorry if I wasn't clear before, but the problem we're seeing has a very clear pattern: 74195 httpd 0.000013 CALL sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK,0,0xbfbf89d4) That the rtld calls don't exhibit. Kostik, thanks for your more detailed response, we'll poke that a bit and report back. Doug -- "We could put the whole Internet into a book." "Too practical." Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EC4C723.9090606>