From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Sep 30 16:16:28 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1C6916A4CE
	for <freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org>; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:16:28 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from forrie.com (forrie.ne.client2.attbi.com [24.147.45.106])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 103C143D55
	for <freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org>; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:16:26 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from forrie@forrie.com)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (i-99.forrie.net. [192.168.1.99])
         by forrie.com  with ESMTP id i8UGGHwu021930;
         Thu, 30 Sep 2004 12:16:19 -0400 (EDT)
         (envelope-from forrie@forrie.com)
Message-ID: <415C31CB.2070407@forrie.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 12:18:19 -0400
From: Forrest Aldrich <forrie@forrie.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040928)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Michael Joyner <mjoyner@vbservices.net>
References: <415A4BB3.3070107@forrie.com> <415BF47F.6070209@vbservices.net>
In-Reply-To: <415BF47F.6070209@vbservices.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-RAVMilter-Version: 8.3.0(snapshot 20010925) (forrie.ne.client2.attbi.com)
X-MailScanner-LocalNet: Found to be clean
cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Status of iSCSI
X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: SCSI subsystem <freebsd-scsi.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-scsi>,
	<mailto:freebsd-scsi-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-scsi>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-scsi-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-scsi>,
	<mailto:freebsd-scsi-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:16:28 -0000

Care to qualify that statement? (ie: back it up with useful information, 
and not rhetoric ;-))




Michael Joyner wrote:

>> I'd be curious of performance stats you may have experience with on 
>> this scenario.   We could could also get a NAS-type device that isn't 
>> as high-end as
>> Netapp (Snap Appliance?).
>>
>
> Snap Servers are *EVIL*
> Run Away!