From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 4 23:16:14 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6F2F16A4CE for ; Wed, 4 May 2005 23:16:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nixil.net (nixil.net [161.58.222.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95AEA43D1D for ; Wed, 4 May 2005 23:16:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from oz@nixil.net) Received: from nixil.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nixil.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j44NEvbF049308 for ; Wed, 4 May 2005 17:14:59 -0600 (MDT) Received: (from oz@localhost) by nixil.net (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j44NEvmd049307 for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Wed, 4 May 2005 17:14:57 -0600 (MDT) Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 17:14:57 -0600 From: Phil Oleson To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050504231457.GA49232@nixil.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.6 (nixil.net [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 04 May 2005 17:14:59 -0600 (MDT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.83/868/Wed May 4 10:35:19 2005 on nixil.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: PR bin/79418 - libedit sync X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 23:16:15 -0000 Since people are talking about a posix /bin/sh, It reminded me that I need to ping people about this PR again. NetBSD made some efforts to make sh more posix compliant, and part of that work involved expanding libedit's capabilities. The patches I made excluded those posix improvements to sh, because the patch was big enough as it was. I just made some small changes to adapt apps that used libedit to the new histedit.h. Followup changes can be made to sh after this patch lands in cvs. Now that ipf doesnt have the tree broken, can a commiter take a look at the patchset at http://nixil.net/libedit-patches.tar.gz btw, I reviewed the patches the other day and did notice that a couple of 'new' files, that the libedit patch creates, are created in the directory that the patch command is run. I've no idea why this happens. So I added a README file in the patch tarball that basically says to go to the libedit directory and run patch with -p3.