From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Aug 29 13:38: 8 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50B8237B400 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 13:38:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from swan.mail.pas.earthlink.net (swan.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.123]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFE1643E42 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 13:38:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from pool0180.cvx40-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([216.244.42.180] helo=mindspring.com) by swan.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 17kW2r-0007fF-00; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 13:37:37 -0700 Message-ID: <3D6E85D5.BF12289E@mindspring.com> Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 13:36:37 -0700 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Eischen Cc: Kenneth Culver , Jonathon McKitrick , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Porting libc_r from -current to -stable References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Daniel Eischen wrote: > -stable already has flockfile and friends in both libc and libc_r. > The only work in porting -current's libc_r to -stable in this > case is to keep libc_r's uthread_file.c which implements them. Whoops! That's what I get for assuming, based on the error message, instead of trusting the code! I see the weak symbol. How is it that he's getting an "undefined symbol"?!? -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message