Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 21 May 2005 22:56:10 +0700
From:      Affan Basalamah <affanzbasalamah@gmail.com>
To:        Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com>
Cc:        freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: amd64 on HP Proliant DL145
Message-ID:  <eb1b5f97050521085668f0d93a@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20050520134353.J8229@carver.gumbysoft.com>
References:  <eb1b5f9705051919546cc50c39@mail.gmail.com> <20050520134353.J8229@carver.gumbysoft.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thank you for your response,
I finally managed to install 5.4 version of FreeBSD/amd64, and by
running portsupgrade, all utilities I need (snort/base/nfsen)
installed smoothly. I think it's ready for primetime!

Thanks!

-affan

On 5/21/05, Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 20 May 2005, Affan Basalamah wrote:
>=20
> > I want to know if installing amd64 version of FreeBSD on my 1-cpu HP
> > Proliant DL145 will give me significant performance gain compared to
> > i386 version. I would like to run IDS (snort/base) and NFSen
> > (nfsen.sourceforge.net) on this box, and plan to monitor ingress
> > traffic on gigeth port of catalyst 6500.
> >
> > Please tell me, is it easier for me to just install i386 on this
> > DL145, or install amd64 to get better performance ? Is there any
> > problem with application such as snort/base on amd64 platform ?
>=20
> snort is a large amount of string analysis and the additional registers
> should help significantly. It appears to work on all architectures so
> there should be no problem building and running it on amd64 vs. i386.
>=20
> --
> Doug White                    |  FreeBSD: The Power to Serve
> dwhite@gumbysoft.com          |  www.FreeBSD.org
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?eb1b5f97050521085668f0d93a>