From owner-cvs-all Tue May 2 10:20:51 2000 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from ms.tokyo.jcom.ne.jp (ms.tokyo.jcom.ne.jp [210.234.123.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBD8C37B550; Tue, 2 May 2000 10:20:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from knu@idaemons.org) Received: from daemon.local.idaemons.org (203-165-77-40.sugnm1.kt.home.ne.jp [203.165.77.40]) by ms.tokyo.jcom.ne.jp (8.9.3/3.7W 04/27/00) with ESMTP id CAA05156; Wed, 3 May 2000 02:20:37 +0900 (JST) Received: by daemon.local.idaemons.org (8.9.3/3.7W) id CAA49158; Wed, 3 May 2000 02:19:38 +0900 (JST) Date: Wed, 03 May 2000 02:19:36 +0900 Message-ID: <86n1m8amzb.wl@localhost.local.idaemons.org> From: "Akinori -Aki- MUSHA" To: peter@FreeBSD.org Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/mk bsd.kmod.mk In-Reply-To: In your message of "Mon, 1 May 2000 11:06:50 -0700 (PDT)" <200005011806.LAA88758@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <200005011806.LAA88758@freefall.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Wanderlust/1.1.1 (Purple Rain) EMIKO/1.13.12 (Euglena sociabilis) FLIM/1.13.2 (Kasanui) APEL/10.2 MULE XEmacs/21.1 (patch 9) (Canyonlands) (i386--freebsd) Organization: Associated I. Daemons X-PGP-Public-Key: finger knu@FreeBSD.org X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1BEF D9B2 BABD 25D7 659A FD08 89C2 F3BE E981 4E16 MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by EMIKO 1.13.12 - "Euglena sociabilis") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At Mon, 1 May 2000 11:06:50 -0700 (PDT), Peter Wemm wrote: > peter 2000/05/01 11:06:50 PDT > > Modified files: > share/mk bsd.kmod.mk > Log: > Remove KMODDEPS support. All our existing dependencies are specified > via the MODULE_VERSION() and MODULE_DEPEND() macros that both the loader > and kld system know how to deal with. The old DT_NEEDED tag is still > supported by the loader (and will remain supported for a while) - but the > kernel side presently doesn't know how to deal with DT_NEEDED. Now that kernel modules' compatibility has lost, why not we bump the __FreeBSD_version? I'm about to do some hack over the vmware and rtc ports and their kernel modules to support 4-stable through the most recent 5-current, and certainly need a new __FreeBSD_version (OSVERSION) that indicates the point where the changes above are made. -- / /__ __ / ) ) ) ) / Akinori -Aki- MUSHA aka / (_ / ( (__( @ idaemons.org / FreeBSD.org "We're only at home when we're on the run, on the wing, on the fly" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message