Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 06:52:02 +0100 From: Anthony Atkielski <atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SPAM: Score 3.7: Re: SPAM: Score 3.3: Re: Instead of freebsd. com, why not... Message-ID: <401267700.20050215065202@wanadoo.fr> In-Reply-To: <42115F49.70908@pacific.net.sg> References: <9C4E897FB284BF4DBC9C0DC42FB34617641AF9@mvaexch01.acuson.com> <961491707.20050215024555@wanadoo.fr> <42115F49.70908@pacific.net.sg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Erich Dollansky writes: > I do not understand why it has to be promoted like this at all. It doesn't _have_ to be, but advocacy is all about promotion. > FreeBSD itself ist just a plain operating system. Every operating system has its strengths and weaknesses. > As long as the programs needed for a certain purpose are in the ports, > FreeBSD is the choice. Hardly. It might be possible to get MVS to run on a PDA, but that doesn't mean that MVS is the choice for a PDA operating system. -- Anthony
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?401267700.20050215065202>