From owner-freebsd-advocacy Wed Jan 8 12:43:50 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D1A837B401 for ; Wed, 8 Jan 2003 12:43:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from pr93.lublin.sdi.tpnet.pl (pr93.lublin.sdi.tpnet.pl [217.97.36.93]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D661543ED1 for ; Wed, 8 Jan 2003 12:43:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from michal@pasternak.w.lub.pl) Received: (qmail 17448 invoked by uid 1000); 8 Jan 2003 20:38:48 -0000 Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 21:38:48 +0100 From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3?= Pasternak To: paul beard Cc: advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Fwd: web write-up] Message-ID: <20030108203848.GA17423@pasternak.w.lub.pl> Reply-To: Michal Pasternak References: <3E1C8287.1020506@mac.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E1C8287.1020506@mac.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG paul beard [Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 11:56:55AM -0800]: > I wonder if anyone has any comment on this web article. The results > of the benchmarking seem to portray FreeBSD in a less than > favourable light. UFS is worse, than EXT2? I can't belive it. Do you think that comparsion is _real_? Who could pay for stuff like that? Lindows.com? :S -- mp To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message