From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 18 22:10:43 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87ABD16A4BF for ; Mon, 18 Aug 2003 22:10:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail26a.sbc-webhosting.com (mail26a.sbc-webhosting.com [216.173.237.164]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4F7FF43FAF for ; Mon, 18 Aug 2003 22:10:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from alc@imimic.com) Received: from www.imimic.com (64.143.12.21)4-0320539604; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 01:07:23 -0400 (EDT) Sender: alc@FreeBSD.ORG Message-ID: <3F41B064.99ED391F@imimic.com> Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 00:06:44 -0500 From: "Alan L. Cox" Organization: iMimic Networking, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.8 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway References: <20030819023149.GA75437@rot13.obsecurity.org> <3F41AA29.A0CA0734@imimic.com> <20030819045035.GA76096@rot13.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=x-user-defined Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Loop-Detect: 1 cc: alc@FreeBSD.org cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: LOR with page queue mutex and vm object X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 05:10:43 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 11:40:09PM -0500, Alan L. Cox wrote: > > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > > > I got this on alpha just now (kernel updated 2 days ago, filesystems > > > created with -b 32768 -f 4096 to test reports of panics with these > > > settings, which may or may not be relevant). I don't think I've seen > > > this trace before...apologies if it's another false positive. > > > > > > > This is real. I'll look into it. > > Great, thanks. The machine is still in DDB if you need me to do > anything, otherwise I can dump it and obtain a gdb traceback. > The stack trace should suffice. Thanks, Alan