From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 9 12:17:43 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB153106564A for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 12:17:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matheusber@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94B178FC0A for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 12:17:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matheusber@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id m38so24501waf.27 for ; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 05:17:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:received:received :message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:subject:from:to:user-agent :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-priority :importance; bh=360hnSaaQYjoXzs8+HDmT7xUCzYDcdzCVmZdX2tObSU=; b=Ri77cimz9m4u77gf2R94Pfc79Be6PAs2Nm51NfYZ/nT2mp6mWAJChObKjUP/xrC1vw V9L0U440fFKXf2W6zUQQ9pgV5iYPyXjdt2gTaEK6Z0hRl+/zlQfAe6kxDslqj0CCgfJB q0mJEBhZJmEDlrWPAfYciF2COBQqgAuBHUCDo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:subject:from:to :user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-priority:importance; b=Jlb60NCtATsaNkhMJEOTMdF/GKmARfR7swsGw3O+ev3RVzEs428a5u3oKp5r+emXId VbT/Cl06ZXrRFyKXj3FD/TIrJYjsnMWA5uKMa2VyrHq+zJ+tCI/kuT/BHuGACpABKe3e a6kiP5eJWv5JMO2yq1p3LudflcGNDkfZUUbQk= Received: by 10.114.169.12 with SMTP id r12mr1211193wae.68.1247141863163; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 05:17:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cygnus.homeunix.com ([189.71.13.173]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j28sm5551955waf.67.2009.07.09.05.17.40 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 09 Jul 2009 05:17:42 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Nenhum_de_Nos Received: by cygnus.homeunix.com (Postfix, from userid 80) id 8EB12B8083; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 09:17:35 -0300 (BRT) Received: from 189.93.27.2 (SquirrelMail authenticated user matheus) by cygnus.homeunix.com with HTTP; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 09:17:35 -0300 (BRT) Message-ID: <73a41d4b72d62b0bfe3d0fb7206376a8.squirrel@cygnus.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20090709112512.GA44158@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> References: <20090709112512.GA44158@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 09:17:35 -0300 (BRT) From: "Nenhum_de_Nos" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.15 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: Re: ZFS - thanks X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 12:17:44 -0000 On Thu, July 9, 2009 08:25, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: > Hi, all, > > I just wanted to say a big big thank you to Kip and all the > developers who made ZFS on FreeBSD real. > > And to everyone who provided helpful comments in the > last couple of days. > > I had to delete and rebuild my zpool to switch from a > 12-disk raidz2 to two 6-disk ones, but yesterday I could > replace the raw devices with glabel devices and practice > replacing a failed disk at the same time. ;-) > > So now we have this setup: > > NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM > zfs ONLINE 0 0 0 > raidz2 ONLINE 0 0 0 > label/disk100 ONLINE 0 0 0 > label/disk101 ONLINE 0 0 0 > label/disk102 ONLINE 0 0 0 > label/disk103 ONLINE 0 0 0 > label/disk104 ONLINE 0 0 0 > label/disk105 ONLINE 0 0 0 > raidz2 ONLINE 0 0 0 > label/disk106 ONLINE 0 0 0 > label/disk107 ONLINE 0 0 0 > label/disk108 ONLINE 0 0 0 > label/disk109 ONLINE 0 0 0 > label/disk110 ONLINE 0 0 0 > label/disk111 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > which will get another enclosure with 6 750-GB-disks, soon. > > I really like the way I can manage storage from the operating > system without propriatary controller management software or > even rebooting into the BIOS. > > Kind regards, > Patrick I've always been curious about this. is said not good to have many disks in one pool. ok then. but this layout you're using in here will have the same effect as the twelve disks in only one pool ? (the space here is the sum of both pools ?) thanks, matheus -- We will call you cygnus, The God of balance you shall be A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style