From owner-freebsd-chat Sun Apr 28 7:28:48 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from probity.mcc.ac.uk (probity.mcc.ac.uk [130.88.200.94]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3E8A37B405 for ; Sun, 28 Apr 2002 07:28:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org ([130.88.200.97]) by probity.mcc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #7) id 171pfK-000GwC-00 for freebsd-chat@freebsd.org; Sun, 28 Apr 2002 15:28:38 +0100 Received: (from jcm@localhost) by dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (8.11.6/8.11.1) id g3SEScw29475 for freebsd-chat@freebsd.org; Sun, 28 Apr 2002 15:28:38 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jcm) Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2002 15:28:37 +0100 From: j mckitrick To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Can EULA's stop competition from *nix? Message-ID: <20020428152837.A29453@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i X-Scanner: exiscan *171pfK-000GwC-00*gRza1acgU/c* (Manchester Computing, University of Manchester) Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Here's a great article a friend sent me: http://www.itweek.co.uk/News/1131114 Samba outperforms Win2k, and is easier to manage besides. This is, of course, no major surprise. However, do you think the recent EULA's from MS will be able to (enforcably) stop Samba and other *nix tools from competing? NOTE: Please CC me, as I am not currently subscribed. Thanks. jm -- My other computer is your windows box. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message