From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Nov 28 14:47:39 1995
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id OAA13095
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 28 Nov 1995 14:47:39 -0800
Received: from ref.tfs.com (ref.tfs.com [140.145.254.251])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id OAA13090
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Nov 1995 14:47:35 -0800
Received: (from julian@localhost) by ref.tfs.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) id OAA24442; Tue, 28 Nov 1995 14:46:57 -0800
From: Julian Elischer <julian@ref.tfs.com>
Message-Id: <199511282246.OAA24442@ref.tfs.com>
Subject: Re: Documentation..
To: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard)
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 1995 14:46:57 -0800 (PST)
Cc: grog@lemis.de, hackers@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <1586.817586728@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Nov 28, 95 11:25:28 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 724       
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> 
> > Jordan K. Hubbard writes:
> > > 
> > > > locking as the result of the change of struct flock.  The binary I had
> > > > (elm) was compiled on BSD/386 1.1, and it didn't run on BSD/OS 2.0
> > > > either.
> > > 
> > > Now try compiling elm on BSD/OS 2.0 and running that under FreeBSD.  That
> > > was what was referred to.
> > 
> > Aha.  How about that--it SIGSEGVs out of start.  Is this known behaviour?
> > 
> > Greg
> 
> Uh.  Greg, you really should read your mail more thoroughly.  This is
> the issue you've been discussing WRT "BSDI compatibility" the whole
> time.. :-)
> 
> 					Jordan
> 
It'd be interesting to see what they were trying to achieve....
anyone know WHY it SEGV's?
what does ktrace say?
gdb?