From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 15 07:00:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8840E16A4D0 for ; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 07:00:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E97F43D2D for ; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 07:00:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i2FF0Qbv021686 for ; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 07:00:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2FF0Qb6021685; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 07:00:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 07:00:26 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200403151500.i2FF0Qb6021685@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: "Timur I. Bakeyev" Subject: Re: ports/52793: Samba 2.2.8a printing woes (fwd) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Timur I. Bakeyev" List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 15:00:26 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/52793; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Timur I. Bakeyev" To: Mark Linimon Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/52793: Samba 2.2.8a printing woes (fwd) Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 15:51:18 +0100 On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 19:42:29 -0600 (CST) Mark Linimon wrote: >FYI. Is there any reason that the change to the default >file, >at the very least, should not also be made to the >non-devel port? I guess, this has sence, since we do use CUPS now by default. Although, it's merelly documentation, rather that a true fix(which should come from samba team side - see http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/48346) With best regards, Timur.