From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Mar 20 17: 2:28 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from pioneernet.net (pop3.islandtransit.org [208.240.196.29]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7930D37B7D4 for ; Mon, 20 Mar 2000 17:02:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chip@wiegand.org) Received: from chip.homenet [208.194.173.26] by pioneernet.net (SMTPD32-6.00) id AA9A8F780168; Mon, 20 Mar 2000 17:04:26 -0800 From: Chip To: J McKitrick , questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: netscape- linux or native? Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2000 17:00:46 -0800 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.21] Content-Type: text/plain References: <20000320170118.G48883@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <00032017024400.05398@chip.homenet> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG My personal experiance is with the bsd port of netscape and I have had no problems with it crashing. Back when I used linux and netscape I had tons of crashes, mainly due to java. I don't know about plugins because I really don't care about them, don't use 'em, don't do anything that requires them. Chip www.wiegand.org On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, J McKitrick wrote: > Is there any reason to go with linux or native bsd ports of netscape? > I just read a message about some crashes under the FreeBSD binary, but > i would also like to support FreeBSD development and reduce the number > of libraries (for emulation) that i need to save space. Any recent > thoughts on this? > > jm > -- > -------------------------------------------- > Jonathon McKitrick -- jcm@freebsd-uk.eu.org > "Doors to the pleasures of heaven or hell, > and i didn't care which." > -------------------------------------------- > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message