From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 10 10:28:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3EE04E1; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:28:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [8.8.178.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A46D8FC1A; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:28:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q9AAS9mf089233; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:28:09 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from bapt@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q9AAS8FZ089224; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:28:08 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: bapt set sender to bapt@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 12:28:06 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Jung-uk Kim Subject: Re: java diablo-jdk Message-ID: <20121010102806.GC26497@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <20121009231547.1f4cfa57@davenulle.org> <5074C1D7.3040209@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VywGB/WGlW4DM4P8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5074C1D7.3040209@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Patrick Lamaiziere , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:28:09 -0000 --VywGB/WGlW4DM4P8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 08:31:19PM -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 >=20 > On 2012-10-09 17:15:47 -0400, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote: > > Hello, > >=20 > > I do not see the point to keep diablo-jdk as a build dependency of=20 > > java. Is there something that prevent us to distribute a package > > of openjdk, just to be able to built a native version of openjdk > > or sunjdk ? >=20 > No. The only problem is we have to provide entire sources + our > patches along with the tarball *somewhere*, just to comply with GPL. >=20 > > I'm tired of the "fetch the diablo-jdk from FreeBSD and agree with=20 > > the license". And even more since I use poudriere to build=20 > > packages. > >=20 > > The FreeBSD java support is not bad (I'm happy with it, I can do=20 > > all my Java developpement on FreeBSD using netbeans and openjdk)=20 > > but this dependency on diablo really sucks. We don't need this=20 > > IMO. >=20 > There are actually two possibilities, i.e., a) build openjdk from > completely open-sourced and bootstrap-less environment or b) > distribute special binary openjdk tarballs only for bootstrapping. b) > is pretty straight forward (albeit the source distribution problem) > and I am working on it as an interim solution. A preliminary port is > here: >=20 > https://redports.org/browser/jkim/java/bootstrap-openjdk >=20 > However, I believe a) is the ultimate solution, e.g., ECJ/GCJ + GNU > classpath + CacaoVM/JamVM/Avian, etc. (VMKit/LLVM is in my wildest > dreams...) Being able to bootstrap using ECJ/GCJ would be awesome :D regards, Bapt --VywGB/WGlW4DM4P8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlB1TbYACgkQ8kTtMUmk6ExyfQCeNQpqQepLbL5VjoVZktlqCMRY RaQAoKyaqfw/EP49jdw/nsQ2lERsBGah =ZyNO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VywGB/WGlW4DM4P8--