From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Apr 14 4:30:13 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from zeus.dnt.md (zeus.dnt.md [195.138.124.37]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA1BA152E9 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 1999 04:30:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sl@zeus.dnt.md) Received: from localhost (sl@localhost) by zeus.dnt.md (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA06439 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 1999 14:25:27 GMT Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 14:25:26 +0000 (GMT) From: Veaceslav Revutchi To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: "cvs-up" vs "latest snapshot" for stable Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG greetings, I am running 3.1-release and I'd like to make it as stable as possible. Can anyone give me some reasons why I should favour cvs-up to the ftp-ing the latest snapshot from releng3.freebsd.org and upgrade my system. I understand both methods require no downtime (except for a reboot). And also, I noticed snapshots appear almost everyday. Do they realy build the entire system everyday? thanks, veaceslav To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message