From owner-freebsd-arch Mon Oct 15 16:29:39 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from misha.privatelabs.com (misha.privatelabs.com [66.9.25.166]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B17CF37B407; Mon, 15 Oct 2001 16:29:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from misha.privatelabs.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by misha.privatelabs.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f9FNSmm74347; Mon, 15 Oct 2001 19:28:49 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi@aldan.algebra.com) Message-Id: <200110152328.f9FNSmm74347@misha.privatelabs.com> Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 19:28:47 -0400 (EDT) From: mi@aldan.algebra.com Reply-To: mi@aldan.algebra.com Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/newfs newfs.8 newfs.c To: DougB@yahoo-inc.com Cc: dillon@earth.backplane.com, mjacob@feral.com, peter@wemm.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <3BCB629A.ACF72517@yahoo-inc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 15 Oct, Doug Barton wrote: > What do you guys think of the attached patch? >+Other ratios are possible, but are not recommended, and may produce >+unpredictable results. I don't like the "vaguesness" of this. Do other ratios work (even if slower), or do the trigger bugs nobody wants to chase? Just MHO, of course... -mi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message