From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jul  3 04:14:52 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E7AB16A415
	for <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>;
	Mon,  3 Jul 2006 04:14:52 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from kip.macy@gmail.com)
Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.205])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5B2D43D46
	for <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>;
	Mon,  3 Jul 2006 04:14:51 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from kip.macy@gmail.com)
Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id 34so366303nzf
	for <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 02 Jul 2006 21:14:49 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com;
	h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
	b=h5v0oOvhHX+G1zXKmrOTXdvex6GQ4E17sUImT7L4p4DaiI7ON90G46clAptH1JTqVNSZoNBLsLAENv9ETeigzO8udR74PUXU1vNMImvLnRq+U96JRqItBXXj9aZoaK6AdGqaoetBF4PTUP1oAXGDcMx6MLDqwEh1r++iTBu1R/I=
Received: by 10.64.91.15 with SMTP id o15mr2656154qbb;
	Sun, 02 Jul 2006 21:14:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.65.225.9 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Jul 2006 21:14:49 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <b1fa29170607022114o3ced1e18v1cdee52153e0d35a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 21:14:49 -0700
From: "Kip Macy" <kip.macy@gmail.com>
To: "David Xu" <davidxu@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <200607030837.04685.davidxu@freebsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20060630001142.Y67344@fledge.watson.org>
	<200607030837.04685.davidxu@freebsd.org>
Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Updated fine-grain locking patch for UNIX domain sockets
X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: kmacy@fsmware.com
List-Id: Performance/tuning <freebsd-performance.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance>,
	<mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-performance>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance>,
	<mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2006 04:14:52 -0000

> I found 5% performance decrease on dual P4, maybe P4 is quite bad when
> doing atomic operation. ;-)

Unfortunately, the consensus is that the only thing the P4 is better
at is video games.

 -Kip