From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 19:18:51 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E470416A4CE for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 19:18:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (f170.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.170]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3451743D41 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 19:18:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j12JId4L001521; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 20:18:39 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Julian Elischer From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 02 Feb 2005 09:44:05 PST." <20050202094256.K88344@localhost> Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 20:18:39 +0100 Message-ID: <1520.1107371919@critter.freebsd.dk> Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk cc: Peter Jeremy cc: current@freebsd.org cc: Garrett Wollman Subject: Re: cynchronised sleep capbilty.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 19:18:52 -0000 In message <20050202094256.K88344@localhost>, Julian Elischer writes: >very clever! > >however it doesn't phaselock to teh time and still drifts. >I need to trigger on (for example) 10 second boundaries across 50 >synchronised machines.. >(so thatthe machines agree about the sampling period.) You'll find code that does it the right way in here: http://phk.freebsd.dk/NTPns/ -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.