From owner-freebsd-current Sat Jul 11 12:48:18 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA00482 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sat, 11 Jul 1998 12:48:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA00477 for ; Sat, 11 Jul 1998 12:48:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@whistle.com) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by alpo.whistle.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA20110; Sat, 11 Jul 1998 12:43:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from current1.whistle.com(207.76.205.22) via SMTP by alpo.whistle.com, id smtpd020108; Sat Jul 11 19:43:18 1998 Date: Sat, 11 Jul 1998 12:43:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer To: Alex cc: current Subject: Re: TESTERS NEEDED: Softupdates looks Very good. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG some fixes were committed for that, but I don't know if they cover all aspects.. On Fri, 10 Jul 1998, Alex wrote: > > On Fri, 10 Jul 1998, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > Thanks. A commit yestaerday fixed one of the known problems. > > that leases us with only the 'hard to reproduce panic'. > > > > I'd say that if people have been hanging back from using soft updates for > > safety reasons, then it's possibly reached the stage where it's more risk > > to your filesystem to NOT use soft updates... :-) > > What about on root filesystems? > > - alex > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message