From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Aug 24 07:46:45 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB872EAA;
 Sat, 24 Aug 2013 07:46:45 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from rdivacky@vlakno.cz)
Received: from vlakno.cz (mail.vlakno.cz [178.238.39.38])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CF2520B3;
 Sat, 24 Aug 2013 07:46:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by vlakno.cz (Postfix, from userid 1002)
 id 5EB4F1CC5840; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 09:41:04 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 09:41:04 +0200
From: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org>
To: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: GCC withdraw
Message-ID: <20130824074104.GA31021@freebsd.org>
References: <20130822200902.GG94127@funkthat.com>
 <105E26EE-8471-49D3-AB57-FBE2779CF8D0@FreeBSD.org>
 <5217413A.9080105@passap.ru> <20130823111647.GT2951@home.opsec.eu>
 <52174D51.2050601@digsys.bg> <21414.1377258940@critter.freebsd.dk>
 <5217A7D8.1030806@freebsd.org>
 <1377285836.31114.13416825.5F534A08@webmail.messagingengine.com>
 <52180DD0.3080308@freebsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <52180DD0.3080308@freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
 <freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 07:46:45 -0000

On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 09:35:12AM +0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 8/24/13 3:23 AM, Mark Felder wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013, at 13:20, Julian Elischer wrote:
> >> On 8/23/13 7:55 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> >>> In message <52174D51.2050601@digsys.bg>, Daniel Kalchev writes:
> >>>
> >>>>> - 9.x gcc default and clang in base;
> >>>>> - 10.x clang default and gcc in ports;
> >>>> I believe this is the best idea so far. As long as these ports work with
> >>>> gcc in ports, that is.
> >>> +1
> >>>
> >> well as I was forced to go back to gcc to get a compiling & running
> >> kernel on my VPS (xen)
> >> I'm not convinced that clang is there yet. I'd be really grumpy if I
> >> had to go through al the ports hoopla to recompile my kernel.
> >>
> >>
> > Curious which Xen version. I'd like to try to replicate this issue. I've
> > seen FreeBSD 10 run just fine on XenServer 6.0 and 6.2.
> I don't know.. whatever RootBSD run, but the fact that I needed gcc 
> for anything suggests that we should keep it around for a while.

Why do you need to use gcc for everything? What happens if you use clang?
Be specific, without details this is just FUD.

Roman