From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 15 12:28:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2BAF1065741 for ; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 12:28:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AB808FC18 for ; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 12:28:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1NVlHX-0000sm-BP for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 13:28:03 +0100 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 13:28:03 +0100 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 13:28:03 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 13:27:45 +0100 Lines: 7 Message-ID: References: <200603232352.k2NNqPS8018729@gate.bitblocks.com> <200603241518.01027.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> <20060325103927.GE703@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <200603250920.14208@aldan> <20060325190333.GD7001@funkthat.com> <4B4F7CF5.4040307@aldan.algebra.com> <4B4F9781.2050508@modulus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20091210) In-Reply-To: <4B4F9781.2050508@modulus.org> Sender: news Subject: Re: An old gripe: Reading via mmap stinks X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 12:28:07 -0000 Andrew Snow wrote: > > Hi Mikhail, I assume these tests were done on UFS. Have you tried ZFS? > I'm curious to see the results. I suspect it would be noticably worse :) AFAIK ZFS integration with mmap does at least one extra in-memory data copy.