From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Mar  7 16:46:23 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 758)
	id 348BA16A4CF; Mon,  7 Mar 2005 16:46:23 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 16:46:23 +0000
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>
To: "J.D. Bronson" <jbronson@wixb.com>
Message-ID: <20050307164623.GE22873@hub.freebsd.org>
References: <6.2.0.14.2.20050307064456.00b15630@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <6.2.0.14.2.20050307064456.00b15630@localhost>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: SCHED_ULE with 5.4-PRE ?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2005 16:46:23 -0000

On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 06:46:04AM -0600, J.D. Bronson wrote:
> options SCHED_ULE
> 
> I ran this option on 5.2.1 with P4 HTT and never had any issues.
> I understand it was removed...but have the issues been resolved

It seems to work for me as long as I don't use PREEMPTION.

> and is it worth using with only HTT and not true SMP?

Depends on your workload, try it and see if it's better or not.

Kris