From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Aug 17 17:42:09 2009
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033)
	id AB8B6106568E; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:42:09 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:42:09 +0000
From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20090817174209.GB10644@FreeBSD.org>
References: <200908171718.n7HHIU2Q094800@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<20090817173909.GA10644@FreeBSD.org>
	<1250530822.23396.66.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1250530822.23396.66.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/security/nss Makefile
	ports/security/nss/files patch-..::coreconf::FreeBSD.mk
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree
	<cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:42:09 -0000

On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 01:40:22PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 17:39 +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 05:18:30PM +0000, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> > > marcus      2009-08-17 17:18:30 UTC
> > > 
> > >   FreeBSD ports repository
> > > 
> > >   Modified files:
> > >     security/nss         Makefile 
> > >     security/nss/files   patch-..::coreconf::FreeBSD.mk 
> > 
> > Does not like good patch name to me.  Also, doesn't it contradict what PH
> > says on subject?
> 
> The patch is legacy.  I simply updated it.  I would never add a new
> patch with that naming convention.

Oops, my bad, sorry.  I went blind for a second and misread as it was
added.

./danfe