Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 22:14:41 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger <pi@freebsd.org> To: Sergey Akhmatov <sergey@akhmatov.ru>, FreeBSD Ports Security Team <ports-secteam@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Ports ML <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>, flo@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Looking for commiter: security update for databases/percona56-server Message-ID: <20190709201441.GB34918@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <20190709200958.GA34918@home.opsec.eu> References: <8bb194c6-5873-bd50-efdc-9d606158bf31@akhmatov.ru> <70daf271-aa81-cabd-9b26-887c1f5c18eb@FreeBSD.org> <6210af30-da80-741d-c615-55b5ec680e89@akhmatov.ru> <20190709200958.GA34918@home.opsec.eu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! > > Maybe the current maintainer of databases/mysql* > > could adopt them, which seems reasonable because they have common > > ancestry. Otherwise I'd like to adopt the port myself. > > Please submit a PR with a patch to change maintainer, add me > to the Cc: list. We'll change it after that PR times out. One thing that might be the reason for this neglect of those ports: The currect version seems to be percona80, but there's no port for this. Then there's the competition from mariadb -- so why is the percona version still relevant ? Can you elaborate ? -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 One year to go !
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20190709201441.GB34918>