From owner-freebsd-security  Thu Feb  1  7:54:16 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1300E37B684
	for <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 07:53:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from wollman@localhost)
	by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA76239;
	Thu, 1 Feb 2001 10:53:45 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from wollman)
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 10:53:45 -0500 (EST)
From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
Message-Id: <200102011553.KAA76239@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
To: Thomas Cannon <root@noops.org>
Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory: FreeBSD-SA-01:18.bind
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0101312024580.58309-100000@sonar.noops.org>
References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.9601312115260.35729-100000@tandem.milestonerdl.com>
	<Pine.BSF.4.21.0101312024580.58309-100000@sonar.noops.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

<<On Wed, 31 Jan 2001 20:32:00 -0800 (PST), Thomas Cannon <root@noops.org> said:

> I think the fact that he puts his own money on the fact that there are no
> exploitable flaws in qmail or his DNS implementation shows an
> obvious

That would be an assertion, not a fact.  (And keep in mind that they
same person has threatened to sue anyone who suggests that there
actually might be security flaws in his software.)

-GAWollman



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message