From owner-cvs-all Sun Jan 28 10:39:47 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from feral.com (feral.com [192.67.166.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9585537B400; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 10:39:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from beppo (beppo [192.67.166.79]) by feral.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA02133; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 10:39:09 -0800 Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 10:39:09 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Jacob Reply-To: mjacob@feral.com To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: John Baldwin , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, Mikhail Teterin Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/conf GENERIC In-Reply-To: <14253.980705528@critter> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > >> One should use md(4) and mdconfig(8) rather than MFS nowadays anyways, which > >> does work with DEVFS. > > > >Uh, I don't think so. MFS should be fixed. With MFS you should be able to take > >advantage of VM. I don't think the same applies to md. > > Try it, and come back with numbers if you think it is worse... Can't really compare right now, now can I, if MFS is broken ... :-)... But seriously, I'll be using md a lot from now on and I'll let you know if it seems broken.... Like I said in other mail (paraphrasing) "Seems like this ought to be a VFS, but I don't really care" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message