Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 11:38:10 -0400 From: "Chuck @ Mantis" <chuck@mantis.biz> To: Kajetan Staszkiewicz <kajetan.staszkiewicz@innogames.de>, freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: adding an additional block & gateway Message-ID: <55843762.3040106@mantis.biz> In-Reply-To: <1704069.kZvlBVo68Y@energia> References: <55839619.8000603@mantis.biz> <1704069.kZvlBVo68Y@energia>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Our data center responded to your question, here is the text:
We can confirm that the new netblock is routed direct via your vlan as with your original netblock
VLAN: vlan655-cbcbmedi-809, Created at: Mon Oct 20 13:42:05 2014
802.1Q Tag: 655, Internal index: 205, Admin State: Enabled, Origin: Static
Layer 3 interface: vlan.655 (UP)
IPV4 addresses:
60.34.75.209/28
79.112.227.33/27
Protocol: Port Mode, Mac aging time: 300 seconds
Number of interfaces: Tagged 0 (Active = 0), Untagged 1 (Active = 1)
ge-5/0/20.0*, untagged, access
On 6/19/2015 9:01 AM, Kajetan Staszkiewicz wrote:
> Dnia piątek, 19 czerwca 2015 00:10:01 Chuck @ Mantis pisze:
>> I'm currently using FreeBSD and PF as a gateway and firewall in front of
>> a handful of web servers.
>>
>> External:
>> defaultrouter="79.112.227.33"
>> ifconfig_bge0="inet 79.112.227.34 netmask 255.255.255.224"
>>
>> I've asked the datacenter for an additional block and received:
>>
>> Gateway : 60.34.75.209
>> IP block : 60.34.75.208/28
>> Subnet : 255.255.255.240
>>
>>
>> Since the gateways are different, I'm assuming I need to use PF or BSD
>> to somehow direct (route?) traffic which came via the new block out
>> through the new gateway?
> Are both subnets on-link or done by real routing? Of on-link and if both are
> on the same router and vlan from your provider, then it is going to work fine
> while using only one gateway.
>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?55843762.3040106>