From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 1 00:21:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 963D81065674; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 00:21:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ehaupt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx.critical.ch (cl-8.zrh-02.ch.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:1620:f00:7::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E880E8FC15; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 00:21:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from beaver.home.critical.ch (84-72-7-76.dclient.hispeed.ch [84.72.7.76]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.critical.ch (8.14.4/8.14.4/critical-1.0) with ESMTP id q110L5Td043821; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 01:21:06 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ehaupt@FreeBSD.org) Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 01:21:05 +0100 From: Emanuel Haupt To: Emanuel Haupt Message-Id: <20120201012105.8562e5a9.ehaupt@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20120201010845.e0ae283a.ehaupt@critical.ch> References: <201201312131.q0VLVPI3000765@repoman.freebsd.org> <4F285E83.7000405@FreeBSD.org> <20120201003411.44bb3e9f.ehaupt@FreeBSD.org> <20120201010845.e0ae283a.ehaupt@critical.ch> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.2 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Doug Barton , lx@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/audio Makefile ports/audio/wmmixer Makefile distinfo pkg-descr X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 00:21:09 -0000 Emanuel Haupt wrote: > Emanuel Haupt wrote: > > Doug Barton wrote: > > > On 01/31/2012 13:31, Emanuel Haupt wrote: > > > > Resurrect wmmixer from the attic > > > > > > How is this better than wmsmixer which we still have, and still > > > works? > > > > From the description audio/wmsmixer seems to be a similar (if not > > the same) dockapp. Unfortunately I can't confirm this since it is > > unfetchable (maintainer cc'ed): > > > > ... > > Installed a package from wmsmixer. From the looks of it it's a > different application: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~ehaupt/snippets/wmmixer-vs-wmsmixer/wmmixer-vs-wmsmixer.png but on a closer look, looking at the help output the pretty much look from the same origin: http://people.freebsd.org/~ehaupt/snippets/wmmixer-vs-wmsmixer/wmmixer-vs-wmsmixer2.png which one should we keep?