From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Mon Mar 20 15:39:26 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BF01D13A2B; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 15:39:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C6E06A7; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 15:39:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id B313B274D; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 15:39:25 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 15:39:25 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Torsten Zuehlsdorff Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r436543 - in head/net: . rubygem-signet Message-ID: <20170320153925.GA5635@FreeBSD.org> References: <201703201357.v2KDvKfK044369@repo.freebsd.org> <20170320140048.GA3711@FreeBSD.org> <92ad0276-2ad6-cd53-6774-162fe9aa6cf0@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <92ad0276-2ad6-cd53-6774-162fe9aa6cf0@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 15:39:26 -0000 On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 03:06:29PM +0100, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote: > On 20.03.2017 15:00, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 01:57:20PM +0000, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote: > >> New Revision: 436543 > >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/436543 > >> > >> Log: > >> New port: net/rubygem-signet > >> > >> Signet is an OAuth 1.0 / OAuth 2.0 implementation > >> > >> WWW: https://rubygems.org/gems/signet > >> ... > >> +MAINTAINER= ruby@FreeBSD.org > >> +COMMENT= Signet is an OAuth 1.0 / OAuth 2.0 implementation > > > > Violation of PHB Section 5.6, item #2. > > Can you provide a better solution? Since its all i can found about the > library it was hard to craft a better one. I see; we're dealing with upstream that does not even care to provide different `s.description' and `s.summary' (per signet.gemspec) themselves. What a pity. I guess I hit that `send' button too soon, my apologies. ./danfe