From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Mon Jan 30 22:16:37 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35BDACC8F1A for ; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 22:16:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bu7cher@yandex.ru) Received: from forward3m.cmail.yandex.net (forward3m.cmail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:b030::1a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "forwards.mail.yandex.net", Issuer "Yandex CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1A04F57; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 22:16:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bu7cher@yandex.ru) Received: from smtp1j.mail.yandex.net (smtp1j.mail.yandex.net [95.108.130.59]) by forward3m.cmail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 2800C20FCE; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 01:16:33 +0300 (MSK) Received: from smtp1j.mail.yandex.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1j.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 8CDC83C80AAC; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 01:16:31 +0300 (MSK) Received: by smtp1j.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id HTap8YbzMR-GUSWJvr9; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 01:16:30 +0300 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client certificate not present) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1485814590; bh=8of2JaqhbmO7ty7uj7y13RlKlx8ff/Fv2aGL2/1HDIY=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Message-ID:Date:In-Reply-To; b=TZlw/XMHzqynDWYHVRWx87CpiaErhRoQ+2Q8BqAlhFGUh7Y2ziAH3GzIShBiZCBxW BdGfOD6g28qBbzLMli3+bEQ43ie3/xZ2Y3gx1kmCZDGWbBI/FepW76dOPnE1OC9puD zC1uNTaxlNS6mG/xrXKh8vv3aBiOyWMa72Hvs/7Q= Authentication-Results: smtp1j.mail.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.ru X-Yandex-Suid-Status: 1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0 Subject: Re: How to safely remove rest of GTP? To: Ian Lepore , Warren Block References: <20161230124407.GN37118@zxy.spb.ru> <1793b0ec-3a86-5c9a-b275-aa93cd9d230e@yandex.ru> <1485796999.3017.7.camel@freebsd.org> <91788d86-c85b-a893-0185-5d6efd8bca7e@yandex.ru> <1485812227.3017.19.camel@freebsd.org> <1485814162.3017.24.camel@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Slawa Olhovchenkov From: "Andrey V. Elsukov" Message-ID: <79fd0b09-33a6-519b-ece3-88e4087c527e@yandex.ru> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 01:15:17 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1485814162.3017.24.camel@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 22:16:37 -0000 On 31.01.2017 01:09, Ian Lepore wrote: >> Of course, it is very useful action. Instead of fixing the >> documentation >> you say to me that is not clear. To me, who understand it and >> doesn't >> see what is not clear. >> > > It's really not rocket science: as long as you keep telling people > that they are the problem, I'm going to keep pointing out that they are > not the problem, and that their confusion is the same as other people > are having. Ok, I can just ignore such questions and don't answer. You will continue suggest to use dd(1). Documentation will remain the same. All will be happy. Is it right? -- WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov