Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 25 Jun 2000 02:32:28 +0200
From:      "clemensF" <ino-waiting@gmx.net>
To:        freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c
Message-ID:  <20000625023228.B3259@spotteswoode.de>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.10006250140430.94644-100000@login-1.eunet.no>; from mbendiks@eunet.no on Sun, Jun 25, 2000 at 01:42:48AM %2B0200
References:  <20000625001840.A1017@spotteswoode.de> <Pine.BSF.4.05.10006250140430.94644-100000@login-1.eunet.no>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Marius Bendiksen:

> Actually, our suser() implementation is pretty non-portable.

i take what i get.  when i can do "man [23] <func>", i approve of the
consequences.

clemens


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000625023228.B3259>