From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 15 21:13:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A416A1065675 for ; Sat, 15 May 2010 21:13:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from weongyo.jeong@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pw0-f54.google.com (mail-pw0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B9708FC0C for ; Sat, 15 May 2010 21:13:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pwi9 with SMTP id 9so2215798pwi.13 for ; Sat, 15 May 2010 14:13:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:from:date:to:cc :subject:message-id:reply-to:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent:organization:x-operation-sytem; bh=ogCdiiynZxCQ98ZYbuJpURiuCEt6e1VhPl/fJyO030I=; b=iIuMhWb2MlIbxWO0fm0n4HPhNRBhzy207jnxdt3SpCNGw+OPxy3AMueX2PI8K4orS0 Xc9JFY9mo5RUoZAL3941coNgNkRpWEk6HZdXBtfJ6UHCvvY96MSk5VrAsdVF/3BCShHh wErz5aA1wNbMidSc7kURSy6S1WBUz4y7ENWQQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:mail-followup-to :references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent:organization:x-operation-sytem; b=wcReqHSWfme50IChv0HAumq5BKReq1jYQ5Ew6mAN09FpvQT787kt55hpHZM2Th4kdQ 9JIpw1dBA+YsYzMjqleXsM5/T3JWdkWrem55kx71CBRuGeGtdYyozNlvnkJOVz+uksls +OaSdfMGx18Y47qkVd5srS8iXanKxS6P++Wpg= Received: by 10.115.67.11 with SMTP id u11mr2551490wak.196.1273957987909; Sat, 15 May 2010 14:13:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from weongyo ([174.35.1.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c14sm32968434waa.1.2010.05.15.14.13.06 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 15 May 2010 14:13:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by weongyo (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 15 May 2010 14:13:12 -0700 From: Weongyo Jeong Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 14:13:12 -0700 To: Gustau P??rez Message-ID: <20100515211312.GB1295@weongyo> Mail-Followup-To: Gustau P??rez , current@freebsd.org References: <20100303082833.GB22865@weongyo> <20100303111014.6564ea1e.ray@dlink.ua> <20100312231333.GZ1295@weongyo> <4BD2201E.3090409@entel.upc.edu> <20100424231755.GI65380@weongyo> <4BD4A928.8020901@entel.upc.edu> <20100506190653.GA31100@weongyo> <58220.88.15.97.205.1273248485.squirrel@webmail.entel.upc.edu> <20100510195622.GA1295@weongyo> <4BEEB792.3040105@entel.upc.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4BEEB792.3040105@entel.upc.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Organization: CDNetworks. X-Operation-Sytem: FreeBSD Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Call for Test and Review: bwn(4) - another Broadcom Wireless driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Weongyo Jeong List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 21:13:08 -0000 On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 05:02:42PM +0200, Gustau P??rez wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > En/na Weongyo Jeong ha escrit: > > On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 06:08:05PM +0200, Gustavo Perez Querol wrote: > >>> Hello Gustau, I'm so sorry for belated response that I had no time to > >>> read and work email and wireless stuffs. > >>> > >>> Could you please test this symptom with attached patch? It looks in > >>> CURRENT it missed to initialize a ratectl when it associates with AP. > >>> > >> The patch made the machine to panic. I think it happened when launching > >> the supplicant. In fact, right now it works by putting the RF switch to > >> OFF. As soon as I change it to ON the machine panics. > >> > >> It get a trap 12, with two reasons : page fault and "bufwrite, buffer is > >> not busy?" > >> > >> I'm running 9.0/AMD64 from 1 of May (don't know exact svn revision). > >> > >> Do you want me to test anything else ? > > > > OK. The patch is ready to test. Could you please test it with attached > > patch? > > > > regards, > > Weongyo Jeong > > > > It worked fine with current. I still haven't tested it a few hours, > let's see if it works. Thanks ! > > However, right now I'm testing zfs with the same laptop (with a > different HDD) and unfortunately I'm seeing the same with STABLE. > Tons of : > > "bwn0: unsupported rate 0" > > I wonder if the patch you sent will work with stable's source code ... Recently the ratectl framwork was MFC to STABLE_8 so it could cause this problem. I'll MFC my patch to STABLE_8 as soon as possible. regards, Weongyo Jeong