From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Jul 16 19:19:31 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id TAA04292 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 16 Jul 1996 19:19:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from root.com (implode.root.com [198.145.90.17]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA04287 for ; Tue, 16 Jul 1996 19:19:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by root.com (8.7.5/8.6.5) with SMTP id TAA09018; Tue, 16 Jul 1996 19:19:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199607170219.TAA09018@root.com> X-Authentication-Warning: implode.root.com: Host localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol To: Robert Clark cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: Re: FW: In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 16 Jul 1996 09:43:00 PDT." <31EBC6E0@smtp> From: David Greenman Reply-To: davidg@root.com Date: Tue, 16 Jul 1996 19:19:20 -0700 Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > The ix0 driver is for the EtherExpress 16. > > EtherExpress (ix driver.) > Pro-10 (No driver.) > Flash32 (No driver.) > Pro-100 Rev A (No driver.) > Pro-100 Rev B (fpx driver.) ^^^ fxp > > I used an EtherExpress-16 for awhile, and had trouble. I found that >there were lots of old (16bit) Western Digital cards around, and switched >over to running the ed0 driver instead. > > Questions to anyone: Do the NE2000 cards work as well as the old SMC/WD >cards? It puts more load on the machine, but should perform similarly. -DG David Greenman Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project