From owner-freebsd-chat Sat Oct 3 11:02:58 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA03680 for freebsd-chat-outgoing; Sat, 3 Oct 1998 11:02:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from lariat.lariat.org (lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA03670 for ; Sat, 3 Oct 1998 11:02:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: (from brett@localhost) by lariat.lariat.org (8.8.8/8.8.6) id MAA17211; Sat, 3 Oct 1998 12:02:29 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <4.1.19981003115959.0410c140@mail.lariat.org> X-Sender: brett@mail.lariat.org X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 Date: Sat, 03 Oct 1998 12:01:01 -0600 To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" , Frank Pawlak From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: Device Drivers for Linux and Intel's annoucement Cc: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <13797.907435971@time.cdrom.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 10:32 AM 10/3/98 -0700, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: >> BTW, Jordan, I have written to publications about FreeBSD. Unix Review >> come rather quickly to mind. Once I was published, and the others >> rejected. In fact the latest issue has some letters about FreeSBD >> written by others, but mine were rejected. Now by your gauge, I sure that >> is my fault. > >By my gauge, absolutely. Sorry if I'm the one to impart the cruel >truth, but if your stuff isn't getting accepted then you clearly need >to polish your style and approach until it is - it really is just that >simple. Wrong. His letters were most likely rejected because editors do not believe that FreeBSD even MATTERS. And that's due to a lack of serious promotion that a few grass roots letters can't replace. --Brett GlaSS To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message