From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Feb  9 15:25:12 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C17286A
 for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Sat,  9 Feb 2013 15:25:12 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from tomek.cedro@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-qa0-f43.google.com (mail-qa0-f43.google.com
 [209.85.216.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A295F77
 for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Sat,  9 Feb 2013 15:25:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id dx4so694111qab.9
 for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 07:25:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
 :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
 bh=TRd6/4ov9J/sPaKlO82TEpQLMskxqBxC27RnaMZkv2o=;
 b=nPfr1cM+K5ff726NlDR3S/sWuWhIE5yZmqUE1lgKxG75t7eWmiulAOgUsU2oztGkpP
 5jC5x/1ubnDZOJ/9cyCzt/3uQPerjNA/JXZ6Sjr+DS+tGS4K5MMOz6XIVtZb9sQ4JOvd
 S5YcwbG5uDxAJyqV8yCCbIxfZzfjgawzgFkI9rtbFudVB/ZeB3Ev/rDIXbx5CmqiACO7
 Hih6hDAjpDwQOXArxid9hUOmdUcI89fwH2ZWedt2Yos41Fyt2a4R5zHXgcR79l7t3giU
 EQHGI8Drz+OqQQ4gUwMpjBSzrQcLxFlmW3GlAkdYklLLT1j5MCoCi1LqKRFap2UdWexo
 NH6w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.49.127.238 with SMTP id nj14mr3775374qeb.9.1360423506114;
 Sat, 09 Feb 2013 07:25:06 -0800 (PST)
Sender: tomek.cedro@gmail.com
Received: by 10.49.71.204 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 07:25:06 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20130209144457.GA2067@elch.exwg.net>
References: <CMM.0.91.0.1360397743.bygg@mail.cafax.se>
 <51163E5B.7070602@zedat.fu-berlin.de>
 <20130209144457.GA2067@elch.exwg.net>
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2013 16:25:06 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 39GBo_ePI5ys9Ey51I6jluevFXk
Message-ID: <CAFYkXjk5pohXYj7dAVm27QXx2aYM4=zpEd3xpweOsXZokX9JDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Intel 82574 issue reported on Slashdot
From: CeDeROM <cederom@tlen.pl>
To: Christoph Moench-Tegeder <cmt@burggraben.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
 <freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2013 15:25:12 -0000

On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Christoph Moench-Tegeder
<cmt@burggraben.net> wrote:
> ## O. Hartmann (ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de):
>> We don't even have the tool tcpreplay in the ports mentioned in that BLOG.
> It's in net-mgmt/tcpreplay.

And I managed to build mentioned Ostinato packet crafting utility with
no problem on my FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE AMD64. If they provide package
and release (which I already asked from the authors) I will make a
port for this tool as well :-)

Best regards :-)
Tomek

-- 
CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info