Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2022 12:23:17 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ipfw@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 267278] ipfw mask addr:mask syntax creates wrong rule Message-ID: <bug-267278-8303-sGllT20c1X@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-267278-8303@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-267278-8303@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D267278 --- Comment #2 from Marek Zarychta <zarychtam@plan-b.pwste.edu.pl> --- Instead of creating a new PR, I will try to hijack this one a bit. I am struggling with pipe configuration for the whole /48 subnet. Tried to use m= ask src-ip6 for dynamic pipes, but failed: ${fwcmd} pipe 20 config bw 70Mbits/s burst 110Mbits buckets 512 mask src-i= p6 0x000000000000ffffffffffffffffffff - wrong syntax ${fwcmd} pipe 20 config bw 70Mbits/s burst 110Mbits buckets 512 mask src-i= p6 /48 - wrong syntax ${fwcmd} pipe 20 config bw 70Mbits/s burst 110Mbits buckets 512 mask src-i= p6 ffffffffff::/48 - syntax correct, but pipes don't show up ${fwcmd} pipe 20 config bw 70Mbits/s burst 110Mbits buckets 512 mask src-i= p6 ::/48 - syntax correct, but pipes don't show up It makes me wonder if dynamic pipes are really really supported for IPv6 traffic. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-267278-8303-sGllT20c1X>