Date: Thu, 12 Oct 1995 22:24:34 -0700 From: David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM> To: Julian Elischer <julian@ref.tfs.com> Cc: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard), terry@lambert.org, jhay@mikom.csir.co.za, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPX now available Message-ID: <199510130524.WAA00559@corbin.Root.COM> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 12 Oct 95 21:56:04 PDT." <199510130456.VAA06646@ref.tfs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> >> > The gist of this is that he wants to work on putting simple linker code >> > into the kernel, and I very much agree with him. >> >> Assuming that you and the anti-bloatists can work this out, this and >> everything following it certainly sounds reasonable to me. >> >> dev_add_char (just dev_add?) >> dev_remove_char (just dev_remove?) >devfs already has dev_add() and dev_link() >these are called by the driver to make a new device in devfs >or to make a new 'link' to an existing device in devfs. >dev_remove is there too but not really implimented.. >maybe I should change the names to devfs_add et al. I must be missing something - why are these mutually exclusive? -DG
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199510130524.WAA00559>