From owner-freebsd-commit  Sat Apr  1 02:49:19 1995
Return-Path: commit-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id CAA02643 for commit-outgoing; Sat, 1 Apr 1995 02:49:19 -0800
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id CAA02630 for cvs-sys-outgoing; Sat, 1 Apr 1995 02:49:17 -0800
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.223.46]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id CAA02624; Sat, 1 Apr 1995 02:49:14 -0800
Received: from freefall.cdrom.com (freefall.cdrom.com [192.216.222.4]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with ESMTP id CAA02599; Sat, 1 Apr 1995 02:49:07 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id CAA02593; Sat, 1 Apr 1995 02:46:25 -0800
X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.cdrom.com: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol
To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
cc: CVS-commiters@time.cdrom.com, cvs-sys@time.cdrom.com, jkh@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/boot/netboot 509.doc if_epreg.h Makefile ether.c ether.h main.c netboot.h 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 01 Apr 95 20:41:37 +1000."
             <199504011041.UAA06393@godzilla.zeta.org.au> 
Date: Sat, 01 Apr 1995 02:46:24 -0800
Message-ID: <2592.796733184@freefall.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@freefall.cdrom.com>
Sender: commit-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> Do we have a policy about preserving support for non-BSD versions?

Nothing so fancy.  I think usually the developer in question sticks his
thumb in the air and says "Is this something I can preserve without
mondo effort now or in the future?" and if the answer is "yes", then
he does so! :-)

					Jordan