Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 01 Jul 1999 09:02:21 -0700
From:      David Knapp <dknapp@luciamar.k12.ca.us>
To:        Paul Anderson <paul@geeky1.ebtech.net>
Cc:        Ulairi <ulairi@jps.net>, Newbies <freebsd-newbies@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: NT vs Linux vs FreeBSD
Message-ID:  <377B910D.AAEA22D1@luciamar.k12.ca.us>
References:  <Pine.LNX.3.96.990701024207.9223l-100000@geeky1.ebtech.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


Paul Anderson wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 30 Jun 1999, Ulairi wrote:
> 
> > NT is about 7 years old. Give it time,
> > perhaps it'll grow up a tad.
> >
> And it's already a huge kludge.  The problem is that Microsoft won't admit
> to itself that UNIX is, in fact, the pinnacle of operating system
> interface design.  It is powerful, easily learned(contrary to popular
> opinion), stable, and effective.  

I would like to try out BEOS before I will agree with that statement.
:^)




> 
> ---
> Paul Anderson - Self-employed Megalomaniac
> paul@geeky1.ebtech.net
> Member of the Sarnia Linux User's Group
> http://www.sar-net.com/slug
> http://zephyr.sellad.on.ca/~paul
> "Ask not for whom the <CONTROL-G> tolls."
> 
-- 
David Knapp				
PC Network Specialist
LMUSD
805 473-4390 ext 426
FreeBSD Newbie


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-newbies" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?377B910D.AAEA22D1>