From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 29 07:28:59 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF8051065673 for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 07:28:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marco@tolstoy.tols.org) Received: from tolstoy.tols.org (tolstoy.tols.org [IPv6:2a02:898:0:20::57:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 585B28FC16 for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 07:28:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tolstoy.tols.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tolstoy.tols.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p3T7Su1c018314 for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 07:28:56 GMT (envelope-from marco@tolstoy.tols.org) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97 at tolstoy.tols.org Received: (from marco@localhost) by tolstoy.tols.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p3T7SuT2018313 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 09:28:56 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marco) Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 09:28:56 +0200 From: Marco van Tol To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110429072856.GB18271@tolstoy.tols.org> References: <4DB98F5D.2090108__2814.45118967003$1304006598$gmane$org@ukr.net> <4DB99860.3070701@FreeBSD.org> <4DB9BC80.9010401@ukr.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4DB9BC80.9010401@ukr.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on tolstoy.tols.org Subject: Re: ZFS-Only FreeBSD and crashdump X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 07:28:59 -0000 On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:14:08PM +0300, Vladislav V. Prodan wrote: > 28.04.2011 19:40, Andriy Gapon wrote: > >At the moment FreeBSD doesn't support dumping to ZFS zvols, if that's what > >you are > >asking. > > And when do planning to add support? :) > Option to use to dump the usb-flash has its limitations, both on disk > size and write speed? Well, to be honest, how do you suppose dumping core to a software raid should work in a situation where the software has crashed? :-) Marco van Tol -- Je moet me niet dood maken met een blije mus