From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 23 13:24:53 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C327F16A4B3 for ; Tue, 23 Sep 2003 13:24:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from MAILSERVER.ofw.fi (ns.ofw.fi [194.111.144.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E69143FF2 for ; Tue, 23 Sep 2003 13:24:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dan.naumov@ofw.fi) Received: from [172.16.161.81] by MAILSERVER.ofw.fi (NTMail 7.00.0022/NT1439.00.90501b21) with ESMTP id xdybmaaa for current@freebsd.org; Tue, 23 Sep 2003 23:23:19 +0300 From: Dan Naumov To: deischen@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1064348701.32783.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.4 Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 23:25:01 +0300 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Fixing -pthreads (Re: ports and -current) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 20:24:53 -0000 On Tue, 2003-09-23 at 23:13, Daniel Eischen wrote: > I understand that folks want to wave their hands and say "just make > -pthread work and do whatever it needs to". I am one of those folks as well. As an end-user, I am not interested in hacking around the source of 3rd-party applications that use -pthread when compiling them from source myself. Not in the slightest. This is BAD BAD BAD for usability. Sincerely, Dan Naumov