From owner-freebsd-ia64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 17 14:24:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ia64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DE9016A4CE; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 14:24:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (209-128-86-226.BAYAREA.NET [209.128.86.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CD1943D2D; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 14:24:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i2HMOLd3055642; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 14:24:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@ns1.xcllnt.net) Received: (from marcel@localhost) by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i2HMOLPb055641; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 14:24:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel) Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 14:24:21 -0800 From: Marcel Moolenaar To: Ruslan Ermilov Message-ID: <20040317222421.GA55610@ns1.xcllnt.net> References: <20040317040254.386947303A@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <20040317113931.GF49920@ip.net.ua> <20040317200307.GA46126@ip.net.ua> <20040317205104.GA29066@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <20040317213014.GB46747@ip.net.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040317213014.GB46747@ip.net.ua> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i cc: FreeBSD Tinderbox cc: current@FreeBSD.org cc: ia64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [current tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ia64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the IA-64 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 22:24:24 -0000 On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 11:30:14PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > > > for(i = 0; i < SOUND_MIXER_NRDEVICES; i++) { > > > > > if ((1 << i) & mask) { > > > > > v |= mt[i].iselect; > > > > > } > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually, this is easily reproduceable by compiling the corresponding > > > module on pluto1 with CFLAGS="-O2 -pipe" set in environment. There's > > > clearly a bug in gcc(1), as: > > > > What happens if you replace the for-loop with an equivalent while-loop? > > > Doesn't make any difference. Ok. I'll see if I can spare an hour or so over the weekend to look at what gcc(1) is doing. -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net