From owner-svn-src-head@freebsd.org Sun Jun 19 05:12:45 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78750A78603; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 05:12:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cy.schubert@komquats.com) Received: from smtp-out-no.shaw.ca (smtp-out-no.shaw.ca [64.59.134.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Client", Issuer "CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E7FC1689; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 05:12:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cy.schubert@komquats.com) Received: from spqr.komquats.com ([96.50.22.10]) by shaw.ca with SMTP id EV2CbY2XWEWlrEV2Dbvmlr; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 23:12:38 -0600 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=P7p4vWIu c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=jvE2nwUzI0ECrNeyr98KWA==:117 a=jvE2nwUzI0ECrNeyr98KWA==:17 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=pD_ry4oyNxEA:10 a=YxBL1-UpAAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=zi7m5VRXUajJoAgkUkEA:9 a=Ia-lj3WSrqcvXOmTRaiG:22 a=IjZwj45LgO3ly-622nXo:22 Received: from slippy.cwsent.com (slippy [10.1.1.91]) by spqr.komquats.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6493013753; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 22:12:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from slippy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by slippy.cwsent.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u5J5CYoL045032; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 22:12:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com) Message-Id: <201606190512.u5J5CYoL045032@slippy.cwsent.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2012 with nmh-1.6 Reply-to: Cy Schubert From: Cy Schubert X-os: FreeBSD X-Sender: cy@cwsent.com X-URL: http://www.cschubert.com/ To: Adrian Chadd cc: Cy Schubert , Niclas Zeising , "src-committers@freebsd.org" , "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" , "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: svn commit: r288291 - head/etc In-Reply-To: Message from Adrian Chadd of "Sat, 18 Jun 2016 20:32:26 -0700." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2016 22:12:34 -0700 X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfIh0upPgUsAsKi6HCn3NWleg9IS/MG2ZlAltD4zcGFHu5S9F3ENwmt+ReZqY9urSxqax4P9F/xX4HK8tjE0tnGpaua+lm14eQ3fmzNCypRtDsUyUDIl/ aFGRMReGFKZZLUoIO2RN2OUA4m7njyxQqPbhbKDPZYFAJ4OAs6mdvriwIYBT3KE3uZm9pRfyYWkEnMMUfqMMAQhC+sOW6y14XrFYkB+JgrUHIGrPuZe7bJIu s9Fttz73yQHGEnPSyM+JtHBBuONBWnSvEaRixIxAEceGj9ukdsE5I97n2k8lrTdywue/+YjVKSk/F/J0Ity0nQ== X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2016 05:12:45 -0000 In message , Adrian Chadd writes: > i think that's fine for -11. I'd like to just move limits to /bin for > 12. (I mean, it's 2016, why are you splitting / and /usr again? But..) > > I don't want to see differing system behaviour between limits but it's > likely unavoidable for 11 and could do with some errata notice so > people know what to expect. There aren't any daemons started prior to critical local filesystems being mounted. I suppose one day there could be but none at this point in time. Setting limits before filesystems are mounted is practically a NOP anyway. (Except it could negatively affect fsck of huge UFS filesystems some day.) -- Cheers, Cy Schubert FreeBSD UNIX: Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few.