From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 20 09:22:19 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F4D7106566C; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 09:22:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org) Received: from sakura.ninth-nine.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:2f0:104:80a0:230:48ff:fe41:2455]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95E818FC19; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 09:22:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org) Received: from pelsia.ninth-nine.com ([192.168.36.207]) (authenticated bits=0) by sakura.ninth-nine.com (8.14.1/8.14.1/NinthNine) with ESMTP id m9K9MAcP018752 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 20 Oct 2008 18:22:17 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 18:22:08 +0900 From: Norikatsu Shigemura To: pyunyh@gmail.com Message-Id: <20081020182208.db6453a1.nork@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20081020065808.GG38923@cdnetworks.co.kr> References: <20081003054756.GB71518@cdnetworks.co.kr> <20081020014057.febeb458.nork@FreeBSD.org> <20081020011339.GD38923@cdnetworks.co.kr> <20081020154925.92359c32.nork@FreeBSD.org> <20081020065808.GG38923@cdnetworks.co.kr> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (sakura.ninth-nine.com [219.127.74.121]); Mon, 20 Oct 2008 18:22:17 +0900 (JST) Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, nork@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Call for axe(4) testers. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 09:22:19 -0000 Hi pyun! On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:58:08 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > > So vsc8211 should be set CICADA on src, but indicated VITESSE > > on message. > I guess Vitesse used OUI Cicada if the PHY is based on Cicada's > design. You also have valid points on regarding OUI. I don't have > strong opions on the naming and if you prefer Cicada over Vitesse > I'll change that. > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > > miibus0: on axe0 > > ciphy0: PHY 24 on miibus0 > > ciphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT, 1000baseT-FDX, auto > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Thank you. In this time(without my patch), VSC8211 is probed as ukphy(4). So please, please:-). - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - axe0: on uhub0 axe0: AX88178, bufsz 4096, boundary 512 miibus0: on axe0 ukphy0: PHY 0 on miibus0 ukphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseSX, 1000baseT, 1000baseT-FDX, auto axe0: WARNING: using obsoleted if_watchdog interface axe0: WARNING: using obsoleted IFF_NEEDSGIANT flag axe0: Ethernet address: 00:90:cc:df:56:e1 axe0: link state changed to DOWN - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Norikatsu Shigemura