From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 7 14:22:24 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from shell.webmaster.com (mail.webmaster.com [216.152.64.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C435E37B407 for ; Sun, 7 Oct 2001 14:22:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from whenever ([206.171.168.130]) by shell.webmaster.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-12345L500S10000V35) with SMTP id com for ; Sun, 7 Oct 2001 14:22:17 -0700 From: David Schwartz To: X-Mailer: PocoMail 2.51 (988) - Registered Version Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2001 14:22:16 -0700 In-Reply-To: <200110061024.MAA23902@lurza.secnetix.de> Subject: Re: Why sshd:PermitRootLogin = no ? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <20011007212217.AAA6070@shell.webmaster.com@whenever> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 6 Oct 2001 12:24:20 +0200 (CEST), Oliver Fromme wrote: >There are installations where people don't want root logins to= be enabled, >whether with password or not. This includes many of the= machines I am >responsible for -- If the default was changed, I'd have to edit= sshd_config >and replace "without-password" with "no" everywhere. =09Why? Having it set to "without-password" doesn't allow root= logins and neither does "no", so what difference does it make either way?= Both settings have the precise same effect unless other changes are made. =09Anyone who could or would install a key for root could or would= change the default root login option. One can make an argument that someone= would be quite likely to change the default from "no" to "yes" (because= they might not even know about the "without-password" option). So having the= option set to "without-password" could actually be more secure in fairly= realistic circumstances. =09DS To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message