From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri May 22 12:18:40 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA24712
          for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Fri, 22 May 1998 12:18:40 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from databus.databus.com (databus.databus.com [198.186.154.34])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id MAA24700;
          Fri, 22 May 1998 12:18:34 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from barney@databus.databus.com)
From: Barney Wolff <barney@databus.com>
To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, isp@FreeBSD.ORG
Date: Fri, 22 May 1998 15:13 EDT
Subject: Re: TIME_WAIT/FIN_WAIT_2...
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-ID: <3565cf630.1308@databus.databus.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> Date: Fri, 22 May 1998 09:43:04 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Jim Shankland <jas@flyingfox.com>
> 
> The reason for the 11 minute wait is so that if the client is just
> slow going through its shutdown stuff, the server can still walk the
> client through an orderly close.  On the other hand, maybe 11 minutes
> is too long?  I'll bet nothing terrible happens if that timeout drops
> to 1 minute ... or 30 seconds.  Even 0 would at worst lead to some
> unnecessary RST's on closing connections.  Anyone have any thoughts on
> this?

See archives of the tcp-impl list.  (majordomo@engr.sgi.com)
ftp://ftp.sgi.com/other/tcp-impl/mail.archive

Barney Wolff  <barney@databus.com>

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message